The alternatives which he mentions are:
1st - That H.M. Govt could require that criminals should not be executed under the process of slow Torture, leaving Officials to arrive at the guilt or innocence of the prisoners according to their own customs, including the use of torture upon the prisoners & witnesses in order to obtain conviction & confession by the criminal before sentence of Death is carried out.
2nd - The other alternative is that all the pirates captured should be taken to Hongkong for trial in the British Courts, at the expense of H.M. Govt & to the inconvenience of the Public Service, both naval & civil.
Upon these two courses, their Lordships would remark that although the trial of prisoners without the use of torture, as stated by Sir R. Alcock, may be regarded by the Chinese as an unwarrantable interference with their criminal legislation, likely to fail, on the other hand it should be remembered that the crime of Piracy on the Chinese Coasts has attained such a scale that Foreign Powers have been obliged to assist the Chinese Govt to maintain a force for the repression of the evil on coasts which should have been efficiently protected by their arms, both by sea & land.
Their Lordships cannot conceal the repugnance which would be felt by their Officers...
Page 571
(end of page)
(start of next page)
...
"
them, by using
Torture to elicit the
brush & confession of guilt, without offering an affront to Chinese religious
convictions.
as re
The alternatives which he mentions
remaining
are:
Fist - That H. ll. goot could
require a
a quarantic
that criminals
should not be executed under the
proces of slow Torture, leaving Officials to arrive at the guilt
innocence
the
or
to
of the prisoners according their own customs, including the use of torture upon the prisoners & writreses conviction + confession
in order to obtain conviction &
by the criminal before sentence of Leath
is carried out.
2nd
The other alternative is
that all the pirates captured
- pirates captured should be taken to Hongkong
for
trial in the
British.
571
British Courts, at the expense of H. ll. & to the inconvenience of the Public Service, both naval & civil.
foot
Upon
these two courses.
my for
Lords
use of torture me
would remark that altho the trial of prisoners without the use as stated by Sir R. Alcock, be regarded
by the Chinese interference
о
may
as on unwarrantable with theer criminal legislation,
experiment likely to fail,
the other hand it should be remembered
that the crime of Piracy on the Chinese Coasts has attained such a scale of
that Foreign annoyance
Powers have been
obliged to apist the Chinese foot of maintain a force for the repression of
the evil on coasts which should have
been efficiently protected by
arms
by My
sea & land.
their
Lords cannot conceal the
repugnence which would be felt by their
Officers
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.